Financial Information
At what point do we say enough now – your Global Warming theory is dead – pay us back our $$$billions Al Gore?
Question : At what point do we say enough now – your Global Warming theory is dead – pay us back our $ $ $ billions Al Gore?
We find out that Al Gore and his buddies in the Global Warming camp have been hiding the secret that they have purposely left out from their charts showing warming trend that the MEDIEVAL ERA was MUCH WARMER then NOW. We have spent billions of dollars on this junk science.
They called for executing those who DENIED the Global Warming Theory http://www.climatedepot.com/a/1096/Execute-Skeptics-Shock-Call-To-Action-At-what-point-do-we-jail-or-execute-global-warming-deniers–Shouldnt-we-start-punishing-them-now
They want UN to add ECOCIDE to list of International Crimes http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/apr/09/ecocide-crime-genocide-un-environmental-damage
Meanwhile at the UN a mediocre railway engineer who managed to be elected the boss of a U.N. climate panel Pachauri has seen his precious IPCC report shredded. When a journalists asked him whether he felt embarrassed that Ban Ki-Moon has ordered another independent panel to check the activities of the IPCC. However, Pachauri protested: “That’s wrong. Ban Ki-Moon and myself have both chosen the Inter-Academic Council [to produce another whitewash] and both of us signed the letter to them,” Pachauri proudly stated.
THE MAN WHO IS BEING AUDITED IS CO-CHOOSING THE AUDITOR. http://motls.blogspot.com/2010/04/pachauri-wont-leave-even-if-he-is-fired.html
Now the IPCC Global Warming claims have steadily been WITHDRAWN as people took a closer look after the EMAIL GATE – and the exposing of the Climate Research being done was a FRAUD and full of Lies. Then the claims
-Himalayan Glaciers would melt by 2035 had the source exposed – A STUDENT’S ESSAY and 2002 Magazine article.
-Sea Level Rise withdrawn after TWO FATAL MATH ERRORS found
The list goes on you can read it at http://www.ocregister.com/common/printer/view.php?db=ocregister&id=234092
As of March 30, 2010 the US is on a 12 year COOLING trend http://www.c3headlines.com/2010/04/will-the-us-ever-warm-past-12-years-has-us-cooling-at-660f-per-century-rate.html
The NY area was warmer during the Roman & Medieval Era http://www.c3headlines.com/2010/04/aw-shucks-peerreview-of-oysters-finds-ny-warmer-during-roman-medieval-periods.html
WHEN ARE WE GOING TO REALIZE WE ALL BEEN LIED TO AND LET’S STOP THE DICTATORIAL ATTITUDE OF THE GLOBAL WARMERS AND STOP THE MADNESS???
db audit
Best answer:
Answer by billy25685
You can’t prove a scientific false or negative and that’s what would be needed to get a court finding Al Gore at fault for public corruption.
-
-
#2 written by Baccheus 1 year ago
Texan, you need to educate yourself before ranting. You post a graph of the lower 48 US states and claim that as a cooling trend. You can’t possibly be that ignorant, so you must be trying to mislead other. It is common knowledge that the lower US states have cooled while the globe as a whole has warmed. But is you want to concentrate on the US, why would you not include Alaska too?
Look at the global data. We are warming. There is no 12 year cooling trend. The warming is happening fastest in the Arctic.
There is no such thing as an educated doubter of global warming. This confusing US data with global data is evidence that doubter are merely ignorant of the real research.
-
#3 written by N - Lothringer Bur 1 year ago
Dear ANGRY TEXAN
Yes you have been so lied upon that you believe that you paid for global warming mitigation which is not the case.
I would ask you to name me specific measures you paid for and specifically aimed at reducing greenhouse gases with a total net cost, including externalities… SO ???????Ok now calm down and think your question twice.
- Comment Feed for this Post
The point would be when some evidence is provided that warming is not occurring, or that carbon science is somehow mistaken.
Unfortunately all of the evidence strongly supports AGW, and there are no credible scientific papers published casting doubt on it (all the skeptical noise is outside of the journals published by the scientific community).
That’s why your rant goes on and on and on about fluff, instead of refuting the actual science.
Try to show counter-evidence to these measured trends. If the climate is not warming, that should be incredibly easy… just show the “correct” data that shows the world to be the way you say it is.
—
http://www.grist.org/article/2009-10-26-global-cooling- -scam-debunked-yet-again/
“The last 10 years are the warmest 10-year period of the modern record,” said NOAA climate monitoring chief Deke Arndt. “Even if you analyze the trend during that 10 years, the trend is actually positive, which means warming.
“Ground-based surface temperature data shows that the rate of warming in the Arctic from 1981 to 2001 is eight times larger than the rate of Arctic warming over the last 100 years. There have also been some remarkable seasonal changes. Arctic spring, summer, and autumn have each warmed, lengthening the seasons when sea ice melts from 10 to 17 days per decade.”
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/earthandsun/arctic- _changes.html
“We find that CO2 is about 30% higher than at any time, and methane 130% higher than at any time; and the rates of increase are absolutely exceptional: for CO2, 200 times faster than at any time in the last 650,000 years.”
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=221
Sea ice – http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews
Extent: “The linear rate of decline for March over the 1978 to 2010 period is 2.6% per decade.”:
Thickness: “Although the Arctic has much less thick, multiyear ice than it did during the 1980s and 1990s, this winter has seen some replenishment: the Arctic lost less ice the past two summers compared to 2007, and the strong negative Arctic Oscillation this winter prevented as much ice from moving out of the Arctic. The larger amount of multiyear ice could help more ice to survive the summer melt season. However, this replenishment consists primarily of younger, two- to three-year-old multiyear ice; the oldest, and thickest multiyear ice has continued to decline.”
Look at how slowly CO2 rose at the end of each glacial period compared to now. In the Dome C core EPICA 17,000 BP it was 190 ppm and took 5400 years to rise to 250 ppm:
ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/paleo/icecore/antarct- ica/epica_domec/edc-co2.txt
On the current accelerated melt rate of Antarctic glaciers:
New Research Confirms Antarctic Thaw Fears – Spiegel Online
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N14625324.htm
“…the Pine Island Glacier has shrunk by an average of 3.8 centimeters annually over the past 4,700 years. But the Smith and Pope glaciers have only lost 2.3 centimeters of their thickness annually during the past 14,500 years. Satellite measurements taken between 1992 and 1996, though, show a loss of 1.6 meters in thickness per year on the Pine Island Glacier — a figure that represents 42 times the average melt of the past 4,700 years.”
A chart of historical temperatures and CO2 ocncentrations for the past 800,000 years vs. today’s CO2 level and concentration:
http://moregrumbinescience.blogspot.com/2010/01/co2-an- d-temperature-for-800000-years.html