Financial Information
Would a “standard”, for sake of argument, for Collins project, tell you need to keep up with the recent?
Question : Would a “standard”, for sake of argument, for Collins project, tell you need to keep up with the recent?
(safety) literature, that you need access to risk websites and logs, that there needs to be a chain of custody for the algorithms, that there needs to be an audit trail of all changes to operational software ?
And would it remind you you need to use UNDOCTORED factory artefacts including factory tests ?
Would the “standard” remind you that commonsense needs to be used, that you wouldn’t (without a great deal of consideration) be issuing change proposals for items that already passed their factory tests.
safety audit software
Best answer:
Answer by mikejobob
I am not knowledgeable with all those terms, Shariputra.
Yet I can tell you that everything that is “standardized” places people in the role of robots, no more no less, where commonsense use is out of line. You need to align all your actions with the norms, the standards. What is UNDOCTORED is also out of line. If no one can DOCTOR the undoctored, then there is failure, imho.
Just my very humble opinion.
I cannot say it better than mikejobob. I am not knowledgeable either, and norms are norms. Standards are standards. Whatever has not been included in the standards may be unaccountable for, also in my very humble opinion.